July 20, 2024

Westside People

Complete News World

Supreme Court ruling on abortion | Bitter delicious win for pro selectors

Supreme Court ruling on abortion |  Bitter delicious win for pro selectors

(New York) Despite their bold efforts, elected officials of the Republican Party of Texas have failed to defend their controversial abortion law from federal court scrutiny. But they have not lost anything yet, far from it.

Richard Head

Richard Head
Special collaboration

In a ruling Friday morning, the United States Supreme Court allowed abortion clinics in Texas to challenge law in that southwestern state before a federal trial judge, banning most abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy.

However, instead of celebrating this decision, activists and pro-choice groups welcomed it with a good deal of pessimism. This is because the US High Commission has not simply refused to block this law, which gives ordinary citizens the power to enforce it, with the possibility of receiving at least a $ 10,000 bonus if convicted.

She offered abortion clinics only a short cut to challenge her. It also said, “Ro V. Wade said, “He legalized abortion in the United States in 1973, until the fetus was credible, about 22 weeks.

It is surprising that the Supreme Court has basically said that the federal courts cannot stop this bounty hunter system which was adopted for blatantly denying the constitutional right to perform abortions to Texans.

Nancy Northup, chair of the Center for Reproductive Rights

“The court has relinquished its duty to ensure that the states do not challenge its decisions. It’s been 100 days since the six – week ban, and today’s decision means no end in sight, “said David Cook, chief of The Christian Science Monitor’s Washington bureau.Me NorthUp.

See also  Meat consumption hits record low in Argentina

All Supreme Court justices, with the exception of the conservative Clarence Thomas, have paved the way for federal courts to challenge Texas law. But a majority of the five conservative judges have ruled that a number of Texas officials, including the attorney general, judges and state court clerks, cannot be prosecuted. Only authorities authorized to take disciplinary action against abortion clinics can prosecute.

They are four in number.

John c. Heirs of Calhoun

This is the third time the Supreme Court has refused to ban Texas law. The power was denied for the first time on the day it came into forceThere is Last September.

As happened in September, progressive judge Sonia Sotomayor expressed her opposition, not leaving Texas lawmakers or her colleagues in the Supreme Court.

Referring to women in Texas who could not go to another state to have an abortion, he wrote: “Their only alternative is to bring an unwanted pregnancy temporarily or to try a voluntary abortion outside the medical system.”

The court should have put an end to this insanity a month before the SP8 Act came into force. What she failed to do then, she still fails today.

– Sonia Sotomayor, Progressive Judge

In the fierce passage of his protest, the Bronx magistrate criticized members of the court’s Conservative Committee for playing into the hands of politicians, who can now be compared to the tactics of John Calhoun, the great defender of slavery in the XIX.e Century.

“This is a shameful challenge to our federal structure,” he wrote of Texas law. John C., voice guard of the Slave South. This echoes Calhoun’s philosophy, emphasizing that states have the right to “veto” or “reverse”. “

See also  Ukraine: Russia adopts a set of laws against sanctions

By signing the majority opinion, Conservative Judge Neil Korsch ignored Judge Sotomayor’s harsh attacks. He clarified that the judgment of the Supreme Court was pragmatic and nothing more.

“In this preliminary case, the court did not capture the final key question of whether SB 8 law complies with the federal constitution. The wisdom of SB 8 as a whole is not on the agenda.”

Other law on abortion

The pro-choice had another reason to be distrustful of the Supreme Court ruling. In late June or early July, it will decide on another law related to the Mississippi abortion that could make the Texas question completely irrelevant.

Discussed in Supreme Court in early December, Mississippi law bans most abortions after the 15the Week of pregnancy. In its long-awaited judgment, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of “Roe V. Wade.” Such a decision would put an end to any debate over Texas law.

Another possible scenario is when the Conservative majority questions the credibility of the “Row V. Wade” nucleus, in doing so he not only verifies Mississippi law but also Texas law.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion activists in Texas have welcomed Friday’s Supreme Court ruling more favorably than their opponents.

“We are encouraged by the court’s adherence to judicial control over the past 100 days, as well as the fact that it still does not block the law,” said John Seiko, legislative director of the Right to Life organization. “As long as this savings law continues in Texas, we will see that unborn children and women continue to be protected in Texas. ”

See also  France | Storm kills 5 in Corsica