Close Menu
Westside People
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Westside People
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • Top News
    • World
    • Economy
    • science
    • Tech
    • sport
    • entertainment
    • Contact Form
    Westside People
    Home»entertainment»Chagall goes to the trash. How is that for Caveat Emptor?
    entertainment

    Chagall goes to the trash. How is that for Caveat Emptor?

    Ethan CaldwellBy Ethan CaldwellJuly 7, 2022No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Chagall goes to the trash.  How is that for Caveat Emptor?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email

    “Sotheby’s respects and maintains the confidentiality of senders and purchasers, and does not comment on matters that are not public records,” the statement read. Auctioned in 1994.”

    A page from Sotheby’s 1994 catalog where the auction house identified the painting as a Chagall painting and listed the source of the work.

    The Chagall family hung for years on the wall of the bedroom that Mrs. Clegg shared with her husband, Alfred John Clegg, before going into the pantry when she moved into a smaller house. That’s where it was, she said, when Sotheby’s suggested in early 2020 that if it was interested in selling items, its Chagall might do well, among others. The work was later transferred to Comité Marc Chagall, a committee of experts established in 1988 that makes decisions on the authenticity of works attributed to the artist.

    In late 2020, the commission released its findings regarding its work. In a letter to Mrs. Clegg, Merritt Meyer, one of Chagall’s granddaughters and a member of the commission, stated that she unanimously found the work to be unoriginal, adding that it was a mixture of several other works including “Le couple au bouquet,” from about 1952, and “Les amoureux au cheval” from 1961.

    The commission wrote that Mrs. Clegg’s painting featured “recurring iconic elements of Chagall’s work”, including a bouquet, lovers, a profile of horses, an image of a rooster, a silhouette of a village and a crescent, but these lacked “true presence”. Translation provided by Mrs. Clegg’s attorney. The letter went on to say that Chagall’s heirs were requesting a “judicial seizure” of the painting “so that the work could be destroyed”.

    In France, courts have recognized the power of expert committees to destroy works identified as counterfeit.

    Ethan Caldwell
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleNASA reconnects with a satellite released from Earth’s orbit
    Next Article GameStop meme arrow jumps on the stock splitting bandwagon

    Related Posts

    The Next Chapter series has been ordered for two seasons at TNT.

    August 24, 2024

    Sabrina Carpenter Looks Gorgeous in Gucci on The Tonight Show

    August 23, 2024

    Beyoncé Will Not Attend the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Representative Says

    August 23, 2024

    Who is Kerry Washington, the popular host of the fourth night of the Democratic National Convention? – NBC Chicago

    August 23, 2024

    Mindy Kaling Defends Boston Fans at DNC, Praises Boston Red Sox and NBA Champion Jayson Tatum

    August 22, 2024

    John Legend Under Fire for Honoring Prince at Democratic National Convention

    August 22, 2024
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Navigate
    • Home
    • Top News
    • World
    • Economy
    • science
    • Tech
    • sport
    • entertainment
    • Contact Form
    Pages
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • DMCA
    • About Us
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © © 2026 WestsidePeopleMag.com. Independent stories, culture, and community coverage. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.